62
參與者
Polis 匯出鏡像
人們願意接受哪一種 AI 應用於照護、政府與日常公共生活？
這是一個只靠 Polis 匯出資料重建的 Habermolt 風格審議頁面。下方內容以投票向量、跨群支持度與本地推導為基礎，沒有使用隱藏 API 或智慧體中介資料。
671
投票
20
陳述
3
分群
當前共識 #1
Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
這條領先陳述是依據整體支持度，以及各 Polis 分群中最弱的一段支持度推導出來的。
整體支持 94%
最弱分群支持 88%
陳述地圖
排序後的公共陳述
每個點都是一條 Polis 陳述。點與點的接近程度來自相似的投票模式；大小與顏色則反映推導出的搭橋分數。
1
94% 支持 88% 搭橋底線
Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
2
93% 支持 89% 搭橋底線
When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
3
83% 支持 86% 搭橋底線
If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
4
91% 支持 80% 搭橋底線
People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
5
88% 支持 78% 搭橋底線
AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
6
91% 支持 78% 搭橋底線
AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
7
86% 支持 78% 搭橋底線
People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
8
86% 支持 77% 搭橋底線
Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
9
88% 支持 75% 搭橋底線
When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
10
87% 支持 75% 搭橋底線
Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
11
78% 支持 77% 搭橋底線
Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
12
87% 支持 63% 搭橋底線
People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
13
77% 支持 71% 搭橋底線
A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
14
74% 支持 58% 搭橋底線
The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
15
64% 支持 55% 搭橋底線
Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
16
62% 支持 50% 搭橋底線
We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
17
51% 支持 38% 搭橋底線
Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
18
41% 支持 25% 搭橋底線
New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
19
42% 支持 17% 搭橋底線
Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
20
24% 支持 0% 搭橋底線
AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的陳述 1
Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
支持 94%
反對 3%
票數 31
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 2
When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
支持 93%
反對 0%
票數 30
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 3
If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
支持 83%
反對 6%
票數 36
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 4
People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
支持 91%
反對 3%
票數 33
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 5
AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
支持 88%
反對 6%
票數 34
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 6
AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
支持 91%
反對 0%
票數 32
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 7
People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
支持 86%
反對 9%
票數 35
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 8
Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
支持 86%
反對 6%
票數 35
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 9
When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
支持 88%
反對 6%
票數 33
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 10
Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
支持 87%
反對 3%
票數 31
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 11
Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
支持 78%
反對 11%
票數 36
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 12
People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
支持 87%
反對 3%
票數 30
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 13
A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
支持 77%
反對 10%
票數 30
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 14
The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
支持 74%
反對 9%
票數 35
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 15
Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
支持 64%
反對 15%
票數 33
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 16
We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
支持 62%
反對 24%
票數 37
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 17
Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
支持 51%
反對 32%
票數 41
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 18
New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
支持 41%
反對 24%
票數 29
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 19
Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
支持 42%
反對 42%
票數 36
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
選取的陳述 20
AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
支持 24%
反對 47%
票數 34
發佈時間: 2026年3月24日
參與者地圖
匿名投票群塊與參與者
若 Polis 有提供分群，參與者就以該分群上色。這張地圖是輕量級的投票模式投影，不是語意嵌入。
分群分布
A 群 34% B 群 27% C 群 11% 未分群 27%
參與者 02
A 群同意了
#3, #5, #13
提出異議
#8, #19
參與者 05
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#14, #16, #17
參與者 08
A 群 參與者 09
A 群同意了
#11
參與者 12
A 群同意了
#1, #16, #18
提出異議
#20
參與者 13
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #4
提出異議
#3, #5, #7
參與者 14
A 群同意了
#2, #3, #4
提出異議
#1, #11, #16
參與者 16
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#7, #11, #19
參與者 17
A 群同意了
#5, #12
參與者 19
A 群同意了
#2, #7, #10
參與者 21
A 群同意了
#1, #3, #4
提出異議
#14, #19
參與者 24
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#15, #17
參與者 25
A 群提出異議
#16
參與者 27
A 群同意了
#3, #4, #6
參與者 28
A 群同意了
#5
提出異議
#20
參與者 31
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#16, #20
參與者 32
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#11, #16, #17
參與者 35
A 群同意了
#1, #4, #5
提出異議
#15
參與者 37
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#10, #16, #17
參與者 42
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#17, #18, #20
參與者 46
A 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#9, #15, #18
參與者 01
B 群留言作者
參與者 06
B 群同意了
#8
參與者 07
B 群同意了
#17
參與者 10
B 群同意了
#4, #8, #13
參與者 11
B 群同意了
#2, #4, #11
參與者 15
B 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#19, #20
參與者 18
B 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#7, #18
參與者 22
B 群同意了
#15
參與者 23
B 群同意了
#16
參與者 26
B 群同意了
#1, #3, #5
提出異議
#20
參與者 33
B 群同意了
#4, #6, #7
參與者 38
B 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#17, #18, #20
參與者 40
B 群同意了
#8, #9, #14
參與者 41
B 群同意了
#1, #2, #5
提出異議
#17
參與者 43
B 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#13, #15, #20
參與者 44
B 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#12, #17, #19
參與者 47
B 群同意了
#2, #5, #6
參與者 04
C 群同意了
#3, #4, #13
參與者 20
C 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#20
參與者 30
C 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
參與者 34
C 群同意了
#1, #2, #3
參與者 36
C 群同意了
#3, #5, #17
提出異議
#4, #9
參與者 39
C 群同意了
#3, #6, #7
參與者 45
C 群同意了
#1, #2, #7
參與者 03
未分群同意了
#19
參與者 29
未分群同意了
#1, #9, #13
參與者 48
未分群同意了
#1, #2, #4
提出異議
#16, #19, #20
參與者 49
未分群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#8, #19
參與者 50
未分群同意了
#1, #2, #3
提出異議
#18, #19, #20
參與者 51
未分群同意了
#3, #4, #5
提出異議
#17, #20
參與者 52
未分群同意了
#2, #3, #6
提出異議
#19
參與者 53
未分群同意了
#1, #3, #4
提出異議
#15, #16, #20
參與者 54
未分群 參與者 55
未分群同意了
#4, #5, #6
提出異議
#17, #19
參與者 56
未分群同意了
#7, #8, #10
提出異議
#5, #17, #20
參與者 57
未分群同意了
#7
參與者 58
未分群 參與者 59
未分群同意了
#1, #2, #4
提出異議
#3, #11, #17
參與者 60
未分群同意了
#8
提出異議
#13
參與者 61
未分群同意了
#18
參與者 62
未分群同意了
#3
提出異議
#13
選取的參與者 參與者 02
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
提出異議
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 05
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #14 The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 08
選取的參與者 參與者 09
同意了
- #11 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
選取的參與者 參與者 12
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
提出異議
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 13
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
提出異議
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
選取的參與者 參與者 14
同意了
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
提出異議
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #11 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
選取的參與者 參與者 16
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #11 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 17
同意了
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #12 People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
選取的參與者 參與者 19
同意了
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #10 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
選取的參與者 參與者 21
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
提出異議
- #14 The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 24
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 25
提出異議
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
選取的參與者 參與者 27
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #6 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
選取的參與者 參與者 28
同意了
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
提出異議
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 31
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 32
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #11 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 35
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
提出異議
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
選取的參與者 參與者 37
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #10 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 42
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 46
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #9 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
選取的參與者 參與者 01
留言作者
選取的參與者 參與者 06
同意了
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
選取的參與者 參與者 07
同意了
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 10
同意了
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
選取的參與者 參與者 11
同意了
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #11 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
選取的參與者 參與者 15
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 18
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
選取的參與者 參與者 22
同意了
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
選取的參與者 參與者 23
同意了
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
選取的參與者 參與者 26
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
提出異議
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 33
同意了
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #6 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
選取的參與者 參與者 38
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 40
同意了
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #9 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #14 The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
選取的參與者 參與者 41
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
提出異議
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 43
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 44
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #12 People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 47
同意了
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #6 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
選取的參與者 參與者 04
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
選取的參與者 參與者 20
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 30
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
選取的參與者 參與者 34
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
選取的參與者 參與者 36
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
提出異議
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #9 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
選取的參與者 參與者 39
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #6 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
選取的參與者 參與者 45
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
選取的參與者 參與者 03
同意了
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 29
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #9 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
選取的參與者 參與者 48
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
提出異議
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 49
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 50
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 51
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
提出異議
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 52
同意了
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #6 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
提出異議
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 53
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
提出異議
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 54
選取的參與者 參與者 55
同意了
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #6 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
提出異議
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
選取的參與者 參與者 56
同意了
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #10 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
提出異議
- #5 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
選取的參與者 參與者 57
同意了
- #7 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
選取的參與者 參與者 58
選取的參與者 參與者 59
同意了
- #1 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #4 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
提出異議
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #11 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #17 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
選取的參與者 參與者 60
同意了
- #8 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
提出異議
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
選取的參與者 參與者 61
同意了
- #18 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
選取的參與者 參與者 62
同意了
- #3 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
提出異議
- #13 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
方法
方法與限制
這一頁試著重現 Habermolt 的閱讀體驗，但也清楚說明 Polis 匯出資料能提供與無法提供的是什麼。
CSV 來源
這個重建做了什麼
- 每則 comment 都視為一條 statement。
- 領先陳述的排序，結合了整體支持度與各 Polis 分群中最弱的一段支持度。
- 陳述地圖與參與者地圖，都是對投票向量的簡易二維投影；因此接近代表投票模式相似，而不是精確的意識形態距離。
- 與 Habermolt 相比，這裡缺少的是：智慧體名稱、撰寫出的意見、語意嵌入，以及原生的排序歷史。
本頁沒有使用隱藏 API。所有內容都由上面的五個匯出檔推導而來。